🎯 Schemes & WelfareMAINS · GS3.4 · GS2.10

Gaya, Nagaur and Umaria are PMDDKY’s best districts in year one

At the first-year conference the Agriculture Minister named the leaders, said year two must deliver measurable outcomes, and announced a soil-health campaign from 22 October.

What happened

For Prelims

For UPSC: The follow-through on a flagship scheme’s first year, with named districts, a stated pivot from process to outcome and a new campaign attached. Deploy it on agricultural productivity and district-level planning, on convergence as a delivery model, on fertiliser subsidy and soil health, and as an example of how delta-ranking changes what "best-performing" means.
What it is NOT: No scores or ranking criteria are published for the three named districts, so what made them best-performing is unstated. No list of the other districts recognised, and no district-wise table despite the monthly dashboard that generates one. The Khet Bachao Abhiyan arrives with no budget, no target and no measure of what balanced use would look like. And the shift to "measurable outcomes" in year two is announced without naming the outcome indicators or the baseline against which they will be read.

For Mains

Syllabus: GS3.4 · GS2.10 · Linkage L2

Anchor
At the first-year event for PM Dhan-Dhaanya Krishi Yojana, Gaya in Bihar, Nagaur in Rajasthan and Umaria in Madhya Pradesh were named the best-performing of the scheme’s 100 districts, and the Agriculture Minister said the second year must produce visible and measurable outcomes.
Substantiation (data)
The event drew more than 370 delegates including district collectors and scientists. The district presentations supplied the texture the dashboard cannot: Gadchiroli in Maharashtra on water conservation and drought management, Alluri Sitharama Raju in Andhra Pradesh on shifting a low-rainfall district to high-value, low-water horticulture. A soil-health campaign, Khet Bachao Abhiyan, will run from 22 October to 30 November.
Position
Naming districts matters more than it appears. The scheme’s monitoring ranks 100 districts monthly on output indicators, and until now only the average has been published - which meant the competition the design depends on was invisible to everyone outside the dashboard. Recognition by name is what converts a ranking into an incentive, and it is also what makes the ranking auditable from outside.
Counterpoint
What the recognition means is still unstated. Under a delta-ranking method a district is rewarded for improvement, not level, so a best-performing PMDDKY district remains by definition one with low productivity, low cropping intensity or thin credit. Without published scores, a reader cannot tell whether Gaya improved on irrigation, on credit or only on data submission.
Way forward
The year-two test the Minister set is the right one and has a measurable form: the 47 outcome indicators already collected for 2025-26 can be published district-wise and compared with the three selection criteria. Khet Bachao Abhiyan is similarly testable, if the ministry reports NPK ratios before and after rather than events held.
Conclusion
Three districts named, a pivot to outcomes announced, and a fertiliser campaign added. The scheme now says the right things about measurement; the figures that would demonstrate it remain inside the dashboard.
Deploys into: District-level agricultural planning · Convergence and delta ranking · Fertiliser subsidy and soil health · Institutional credit in eastern India
Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare · 2026-10-12 · PRID 2322267 · PIB source ↗
Related: PM Dhan-Dhaanya Krishi Yojana · Khet Bachao Abhiyan · Kisan Credit Card · Rice-fallow cultivation