💹 Economy & FinanceMAINS · GS3.9 · GS3.1

Lighthouse visits are up 4.7 times since 2014, to 68 a day per site

A backgrounder counts 205 lighthouses, 75 of them developed for tourism, and 18.63 lakh visitors in 2024-25 against about 4 lakh in 2014.

What happened

For Prelims

For UPSC: A compact set of figures on an asset class that rarely appears in the news and sits at the junction of infrastructure, tourism and maritime safety. Deploy it on infrastructure put to a second use, on coastal tourism and livelihoods under Sagarmala, on AIS and maritime domain awareness, and as a worked example of reading a growth multiple against a per-site average before calling it a success.
What it is NOT: No revenue figure appears anywhere - not ticket income, not the cost of developing a site, not what the 75 developed lighthouses earn or cost to run, so whether lighthouse tourism pays for itself is unanswerable from the release. No State-wise or site-wise visitor breakdown, so the 18.63 lakh could be concentrated at a handful of urban stations. No employment number, though employment is claimed. Nothing on what became of the keepers, and nothing on the 130 lighthouses not developed for tourism - whether they are unsuitable, unfunded or simply next.

For Mains

Syllabus: GS3.9 · GS3.1 · Linkage L2

Anchor
A PIB backgrounder sets out the second life of India’s lighthouses: 205 of them along a coastline of over 11,000 km, 75 developed as tourism destinations, and visitor numbers up from about 4 lakh in 2014 to 18.63 lakh in 2024-25.
Substantiation (data)
The growth is real - 4.7 times in about eleven years, which compounds at roughly 15 per cent a year. The scale is modest: 18.63 lakh visitors spread over 75 developed sites is about 24,800 a year each, or 68 a day. On the working side, every lighthouse is solar-powered and 87 Automatic Identification System shore stations now sit on lighthouse towers, which is the more consequential change.
Position
The useful way to read this is as asset reuse rather than tourism policy. The tower, the land and the staff exist because ships need them; opening the site to visitors adds a revenue stream and a reason to maintain the fabric without adding a new asset. That is the same logic as heritage hotels in disused palaces or walking tracks on decommissioned rail lines, and it is why the per-site visitor average matters less than whether the navigational function is undisturbed.
Substantiation (example)
Mahabalipuram carries the whole argument in one station. The Pallavas ran a port there in the seventh century and a log fire guided vessels in; the first conventional lighthouse was put on the roof of the Olakkaneeswar Temple in 1887 with a wick lamp in a fourth-order optic; the light became three 150-watt metal halide lamps in 2004; and the present 26-metre stone tower was fitted with a 236-watt LED array in 2020. The function never changed, only the technology and now the visitors.
Way forward
The test is the one the release does not set: whether ticket revenue covers the cost of the pathways, gardens and amphitheatres, and whether the 130 lighthouses still closed are being held back by suitability or by money. A digital ticketing portal makes both answerable, because it generates exactly the site-wise data that is missing here.
Conclusion
A navigational directorate has quietly become a tourism operator with 18.63 lakh visitors a year, and has published every number except the one that would show whether it is worth doing.
Deploys into: Infrastructure reuse and coastal tourism · Maritime safety and AIS · Sagarmala and coastal livelihoods · Reading growth multiples against per-unit averages
PIB Backgrounder (Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways) · 2026-10-10 · PRID 2321704 · PIB source ↗
Related: Directorate General of Lighthouses and Lightships · Marine Aids to Navigation Act 2021 · Automatic Identification System · Sagarmala