⚖️ Polity & GovernanceMAINS · GS2.6 · GS2.15

Law Ministry's 'Reforms Utsav' ends at Mount Abu with a 'Sankalp Patra' for a future-ready legal system

A two-day 'Reforms Utsav & Chintan Shivir 2026' by the Ministry of Law & Justice concluded at Mount Abu with the adoption of a 'Sankalp Patra' (Mount Abu Declaration) — a shared roadmap for a future-ready, technology-enabled, citizen-centric legal ecosystem for Viksit Bharat @2047.

What happened

For Prelims

For UPSC: Frame this as executive-led judicial and legislative reform — tackling pendency and access to justice through legislative modernisation, digital transformation (eCourts/NJDG) and ADR, with the economic cost of delayed justice as the driver. Anchor the three departments of the Law Ministry, the Department of Justice's eCourts/NJDG, the Mediation Act 2023 and ADR mechanisms, and the balance of speed, accountability and citizen-centricity in the justice system.
What it is NOT: This is a policy-brainstorming conclave that adopted a non-binding 'Sankalp Patra'/roadmap, not a new law or a judicial verdict. It reflects the executive (Law Ministry) side of reform — legislative drafting, legal affairs and justice delivery — not the judiciary's own administration. eCourts is analyst context for 'digital transformation', not a term the release itself uses.

For Mains

Syllabus: GS2.6 · GS2.15 · Linkage L2

Anchor
Reforming the justice system for speed and access — legislative modernisation, digital transformation and ADR to cut pendency, framed by the economic cost of delayed justice.
Substantiation (data)
'Reforms Utsav & Chintan Shivir 2026' (Depts of Legal Affairs & Legislative) concludes at Mount Abu with a 'Sankalp Patra' (Mount Abu Declaration) for a future-ready, tech-enabled, citizen-centric legal ecosystem; four breakout sessions; Law Minister Meghwal on justice delay and economic cost.
Exemplification
Concrete reform tracks — legislative modernisation, digital transformation (eCourts/NJDG-type tools), litigation management and ADR (mediation under the Mediation Act 2023).
Problematisation
Huge case pendency, procedural delays and access barriers impose economic and social costs; reforms must overcome capacity gaps, uneven digital infrastructure and the executive-judiciary coordination challenge.
Way-forward
Modernise laws, scale eCourts/NJDG and ADR, improve litigation management (including government as the largest litigant), and institutionalise accountability and a shared reform roadmap.
Position
Government stance: a convergent, accountable and technology-enabled legal ecosystem is essential to timely justice and to Viksit Bharat @2047.
Deploys into: Structure & functioning of the executive and judiciary (GS2.6 executive & judiciary — judicial reforms & pendency) · governance and e-governance in justice delivery (GS2.15 e-governance — eCourts/NJDG) · ADR and the Mediation Act 2023, legislative modernisation, and access to justice.
Ministry of Law & Justice · 2026-07-05 · PRID 2281391 · PIB source ↗
Related: Polity & Governance · this week's cards · Judicial reform & ADR