🤝 Schemes & WelfareMAINS · GS2.12 · GS1.6

VP links tribal welfare schemes to science and tradition

The Vice President opens a DST–NECTAR conference on lifting tribal lives through science while preserving language, faith and culture.

What happened

Background & context

This was a ceremonial address, but it pulled together the entire architecture of India's tribal-development effort — the kind of map UPSC tests through "which scheme does what" and "match the programme to its ministry" questions. The thread running through it is the dual mandate captured in "Vikas Bhi, Virasat Bhi": deliver roads, water and schools to the most isolated communities while protecting their languages, faith systems and ecological knowledge.

The institutional anchor is the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, carved out in 1999 from the then Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment under the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government, to act as the single nodal ministry for the welfare and development of Scheduled Tribes. Around it sit a family of constitutional and statutory protections — the Fifth and Sixth Schedules, the provisions of Articles 342 (notification of Scheduled Tribes), 244 and 275(1) (grants-in-aid to tribal areas), and laws such as the Forest Rights Act, 2006 and PESA, 1996 — which together define who is a tribal community and what rights attach to tribal land and forests. The two programmes the Vice President named are the current delivery vehicles riding on that base.

The science angle is supplied by DST and NECTAR. NECTAR is an autonomous society under DST, headquartered in Shillong, set up to take appropriate technologies to the North-East and other remote regions — for example geospatial mapping, telemedicine, bamboo and natural-fibre technology, and disaster support. Pairing a tribal-welfare conference with a technology body signals the intended pivot: moving tribal schemes from pure entitlement transfer toward technology-enabled delivery (mapping un-surveyed habitations, planning last-mile roads, and documenting traditional knowledge).

For Prelims

What this is NOT: PM-JANMAN is not a generic all-tribal scheme — it is targeted specifically at PVTG habitations, the most vulnerable slice of Scheduled Tribes, not at every Scheduled Tribe household. It is also distinct from the broader Dharti Aaba Janjatiya Gram Utkarsh Abhiyan, which covers tribal villages at large; do not treat the two as the same programme. The Vice President "establishing" or "supporting" the Ministry of Tribal Affairs in the address is a reference to the 1999 Vajpayee-era creation of the ministry — it was not created by this conference. NECTAR is a technology-application body under DST, not a tribal-affairs body, and not the Tribal Cooperative Marketing Federation (TRIFED), which is the separate marketing arm under the Ministry of Tribal Affairs.
For UPSC: PM-JANMAN targets the 75 PVTGs (launched 2023, nodal Ministry of Tribal Affairs); Dharti Aaba Janjatiya Gram Utkarsh Abhiyan covers 63,000+ tribal villages; the Ministry of Tribal Affairs was created in 1999 (Vajpayee government). "Dharti Aaba" = Birsa Munda.

The tribal-development scheme family (the full set)

Carrying this set lets you survive "how many of the following are tribal-welfare schemes" and "match the scheme to its target group" formats. The single most common confusion the examiner exploits is PM-JANMAN (PVTGs only) versus the broader village schemes — keep that boundary sharp.

Why it matters

The problem the address speaks to is a familiar development gap: PVTG habitations and remote tribal villages are often un-surveyed, off the road network and outside the reach of routine government delivery, so blanket schemes pass them by. PM-JANMAN and the Dharti Aaba Abhiyan are designed as saturation missions — they aim to cover every habitation in scope with a fixed bundle of basic services, rather than leave coverage to demand-driven uptake that the most isolated communities cannot generate. The road-and-bridge numbers (2,400+ roads, ~7,300 km, 160+ bridges) matter because physical access is the binding constraint for everything else — a school or health sub-centre is only usable if a road reaches it.

The deeper significance is the framing of development as compatible with cultural preservation rather than opposed to it. Tribal communities are repositories of biodiversity knowledge and sustainable forest-use practices; the "Vikas Bhi, Virasat Bhi" framing argues that delivering modern services need not dissolve language, faith and ecological knowledge. For governance, the conference signals an attempt to fold science and technology (mapping, connectivity, telemedicine, traditional-knowledge documentation) into welfare delivery, which is the contemporary direction of tribal-development policy.

For Mains

Exemplification
When a question asks for government interventions for the most vulnerable sections, PM-JANMAN (PVTG saturation) and the Dharti Aaba Janjatiya Gram Utkarsh Abhiyan (63,000+ villages) are clean, current examples of targeted tribal welfare.
Substantiation
The 2,400+ roads / ~7,300 km / 160+ bridges figures, the 75 PVTGs, the ~9% tribal population and ~1.4 lakh villages give concrete data to anchor an answer on tribal development or last-mile delivery.
Anchor
For a question framed directly on PVTG welfare or saturation-mode delivery, PM-JANMAN can carry the whole answer — nodal ministry, target group, convergence model and access-first logic.
Position
"Vikas Bhi, Virasat Bhi" is the government's stated stance that development and cultural preservation are complementary, useful as the official position in answers on tribal identity vs modernisation.
Way-forward
The DST–NECTAR pairing models a way forward — embedding geospatial mapping, connectivity and traditional-knowledge documentation into welfare schemes so that the most isolated habitations are first located, then served.
Problematisation
The address itself implies the core problem: PVTG and remote tribal habitations are routinely missed by demand-driven schemes, which is exactly why a saturation mission was needed.
Deploys into: welfare schemes for vulnerable sections (GS2.12) · salient features of Indian society / tribal diversity and the development-vs-identity tension (GS1.6) · last-mile governance and saturation delivery.
Vice President's Secretariat · 2026-04-12 · PRID 2251242 · PIB source ↗