💰 Economy & FinanceMAINS · GS2.15 · GS3.1

GeM crosses ₹18.4 lakh crore cumulative procurement

India's central e-procurement marketplace reports a cumulative value milestone, with small enterprises and women-led units taking a rising share of the spend.

What happened

Background & context

Public procurement — the purchase of goods, works and services by government departments, attached offices, autonomous bodies and public-sector undertakings — is one of the largest single streams of public spending in India. Historically this was handled through the manual Directorate General of Supplies and Disposals (DGS&D), the central purchase organisation that ran rate contracts on paper. That system was slow, paper-heavy and opaque, with limited price discovery and weak audit trails.

To replace it, the Government e Marketplace was launched in 2016 as a dedicated online platform for end-to-end public procurement. It was conceived as a "no-cost-to-buyer" national marketplace where any registered government buyer can purchase common-use goods and services, and the manual DGS&D rate-contract system was wound down in favour of GeM. GeM operates under the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, through the Department of Commerce, and is run by a Special Purpose Vehicle — GeM SPV, a Section 8 (not-for-profit) company — created to build and manage the platform.

The platform's design goals are transparency, efficiency, speed and inclusion. By moving procurement online, GeM aims to compress the buying cycle, create open price discovery through competitive bidding and reverse auctions, leave a complete digital audit trail, and widen the supplier base so that small, first-time and disadvantaged sellers can reach the entire government as a single customer. The FY 2025-26 figures in this release are best read as a progress report against those original objectives — particularly the inclusion goal, where the share captured by small and women-led enterprises is the headline.

GeM sits inside a wider public-procurement reform architecture that an aspirant should be able to place side by side. The headline rulebook is the General Financial Rules (GFR), 2017, which made procurement of common goods and services through GeM the default route for government buyers and embedded the platform in the financial-discipline framework. Alongside it runs the Public Procurement (Preference to Make in India) Order, which steers government buying toward domestic suppliers, and the long-standing Public Procurement Policy for Micro and Small Enterprises, which sets a procurement-from-MSE target with sub-targets reserved for SC/ST-owned and women-owned units. The MSE, women-led, SC/ST and startup shares reported in this release are precisely the metrics those policies are written to move — which is why GeM publishes them as its primary scorecard rather than reporting throughput alone.

The platform also rides on the broader Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) idea India has pursued — the same family of thinking that produced Aadhaar-based identity, UPI for payments and the account-aggregator framework for data. In that lineage GeM is the procurement layer: a shared, rules-based digital rail that many participants plug into, rather than a one-off application. Understanding GeM as DPI rather than as a single website explains why its growth compounds — every new State, ministry or seller that onboards increases the platform's value to every other participant.

For Prelims

What it is NOT: GeM is a procurement marketplace, not a trading exchange or e-commerce site for the general public — only registered government buyers may purchase, and only the seller community supplies. It is distinct from the Central Public Procurement Portal (CPPP), which is a tender-publishing and bid-management portal for works and large projects; GeM is the catalogue-and-buy marketplace for goods and services. It is also distinct from the Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC), an open protocol for private retail e-commerce, and from UDYAM, the MSME registration portal — GeM is where registered sellers transact, UDYAM is where an MSME formally registers as one. "GMV" here means cumulative order value routed through the platform, not government revenue or profit.
For UPSC: GeM = the unified online public-procurement marketplace (launched 2016, under the Ministry of Commerce & Industry, run by a Section 8 GeM SPV) that replaced the manual DGS&D system; remember the FY 2025-26 inclusion signal — MSEs at 47.1% of GMV and women-led MSEs above ₹28,000 crore in orders.

Why it matters

The significance of GeM lies less in the headline number and more in what the number represents: a shift in how the State spends money. Three problems are being addressed at once. First, transparency and integrity — manual procurement was prone to favouritism, padded rate contracts and weak audit trails; an online marketplace with competitive bidding, reverse auctions and AI-driven anomaly detection narrows the discretion at which leakage occurs. The Bid Health Scores and collusive-bidding detection mentioned in the release are direct answers to cartelisation, a long-standing weakness of tendering.

Second, efficiency and price discovery — pooling the entire government's demand onto one platform lets buyers compare prices instantly and lets sellers reach every department at once, compressing a procurement cycle that once took months. Third, and most prominent in this release, inclusion. Public procurement is one of the most powerful levers a government has to shape an economy, because the State is the single largest buyer. By steering 47.1% of GMV to MSEs and tracking the shares going to women-led units, SC/ST entrepreneurs and startups, GeM turns routine purchasing into a tool of inclusive growth — giving small and first-time suppliers guaranteed access to a vast, creditworthy customer. The 38.3% jump in State procurement matters because it shows the platform spreading from a Central-ministry tool into a genuinely national one, multiplying all three effects.

There is a fiscal dimension as well. Because the State is buying at the scale of lakhs of crores, even small percentage savings from open price discovery translate into very large absolute savings on the exchequer — a recurring claim made for the platform is that aggregated competitive buying lowers the unit price the government pays compared with fragmented manual purchase. For the seller side, prompt and predictable payment against a government order improves the working-capital position of small firms that otherwise struggle with delayed receivables; this is part of why guaranteed access to government demand is treated as a credit and survival lever for MSEs, not merely a sales channel. The inclusion numbers and the integrity tools therefore reinforce each other: a transparent, audit-rich marketplace is also the one in which a small or first-time supplier can compete on price without needing connections, which is exactly what the rising MSE and women-led shares are meant to demonstrate.

At the same time, the figures should be read with care. A large GMV share for MSEs measures the value of orders placed, not the depth or durability of participation, and a platform can still see activity concentrate among a relatively small set of capable suppliers. The very fact that GeM deploys AI to watch for abnormal pricing and collusive bidding is an admission that integrity risk migrates rather than disappears when procurement goes digital. These caveats are what make GeM a richer Mains example than a simple success story — it lets an answer hold both the achievement and its limits in view.

For Mains

Data
GeM's FY 2025-26 figures supply hard, citable evidence for answers on e-governance and inclusive procurement: ₹18.4 lakh crore cumulative GMV, MSEs at 47.1% of GMV, women-led MSEs above ₹28,000 crore in orders, and a 38.3% rise in State procurement.
Exemplification
It is a ready example of technology-enabled transparency in governance — AI/ML catalogue validation, anomaly detection and Bid Health Scores deployed against the classic procurement ills of cartelisation, padded pricing and opacity.
Anchor
A question on reforming public procurement, or on the State as a market-maker for small enterprise, can be built directly around GeM as the central institutional answer to the manual DGS&D era.
Position
It states the government's stance that digital public infrastructure should be inclusive by design — measured by the share of spend reaching small, women-led and SC/ST suppliers, not merely by total throughput.
Problematisation
The reliance on AI to detect abnormal pricing and collusive bidding implicitly admits that integrity risks persist even on a digital platform — a hook for discussing the limits of technological fixes to governance problems.
Way forward
The model points toward deeper State-level onboarding and seller hand-holding as the route to widening genuine MSE participation rather than concentration among large incumbents.
Deploys into: GS2.15 (e-governance, transparency and accountability) and GS3.1 / GS3.2 (inclusive growth and the State's role in widening economic access for MSEs and women-led enterprise).

Source

Ministry of Commerce & Industry · 2026-04-06 · PRID 2249335 · PIB source ↗