๐ŸŒ International RelationsMAINS ยท GS2.18 ยท GS3.8

India's FTA network reaches nine pacts across 38 countries

A year-end stocktake of the free-trade agreements India has signed, implemented or announced through 2025-26 โ€” and the countries each one opens.

What happened

Background and context

A Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is a treaty between two or more countries that cuts or removes customs duties and eases non-tariff barriers on goods traded between them, usually alongside commitments on services, investment and rules of origin. India's newer agreements increasingly carry richer titles than the plain "FTA" label, and the difference is examinable. A CEPA (Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement) and a CECA (Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement) go beyond goods to bind services, investment and economic cooperation; a CETA (Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement) and a TEPA (Trade and Economic Partnership Agreement) are the names India used for the UK and EFTA deals respectively; an ECTA / ECA (Economic Cooperation and Trade Agreement) such as the one with Australia is typically an "early harvest" or interim arrangement that a fuller CECA is meant to follow. All of these are FTAs in substance; the labels signal how broad the coverage is.

India's trade-agreement push sits inside the wider Foreign Trade Policy and is steered by the Department of Commerce within the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, the nodal body that negotiates and notifies these treaties. The 2025-26 burst marks a clear shift from India's earlier caution. After walking out of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) in November 2019 โ€” a 15-nation Asia-Pacific bloc India declined to join over fears of a flood of Chinese imports and an unprotected dairy sector โ€” New Delhi pivoted to a string of bilateral and pluri-lateral deals where it could ring-fence its sensitive sectors. The UAE CEPA in 2022 was the first of this new wave, and the agreements since then form the family this review counts.

The single biggest milestone of the year under review is procedural rather than a new signing: the India-EFTA TEPA crossing from "signed" (10 March 2024) to "in force" (1 October 2025). It carries a headline pledge of USD 100 billion of investment into India over 15 years from the EFTA bloc, tied to job-creation targets โ€” an investment-linked design unusual for an Indian trade pact and a likely prelims-and-mains hook.

It helps to read the deals individually, because UPSC questions tend to pin a single agreement to a single detail. The India-UAE CEPA (in force May 2022) was India's first trade pact with a West Asian nation and is credited with a sharp jump in bilateral merchandise trade; it also gave preferential access to gems, jewellery and textiles. The India-Australia ECTA is an "early harvest" deal โ€” a slimmer, interim agreement implemented in December 2022, with a fuller Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) intended to follow. The India-UK CETA, signed in July 2025 after years of negotiation, is notable for its Double Contribution Convention sparing Indian workers in the UK from paying social-security contributions in both countries for a set period โ€” a mobility win as much as a tariff one. The India-Oman CEPA extended the Gulf push begun with the UAE. The India-EU FTA of 27 January 2026 is the most ambitious of the set, opening a single market of 27 member states. Read together, the family shows India sequencing from smaller, lower-risk partners toward its largest and most demanding trading blocs.

For Prelims

The full set โ€” match the agreement to its name and partner(s):

PartnerName of the pactStatus in the review
MauritiusCECPA (an FTA)2021 โ€” first with an African nation
UAECEPAMay 2022
AustraliaECTAImplemented December 2022
EFTA (4 states)TEPASigned 10 Mar 2024; in force 1 Oct 2025
United KingdomCETASigned July 2025
OmanCEPADecember 2025
New ZealandFTAAnnounced 22 December 2025
European UnionFTA27 January 2026
United StatesInterim framework7 February 2026 (framework only)

What it is NOT: An FTA is not a customs union (members of an FTA keep their own separate external tariffs against non-members; a customs union shares a common external tariff). It is not a common market (no free movement of labour or capital is implied). The EFTA TEPA is not an EU agreement โ€” confusing the four EFTA states with the EU's 27 is the single most common trap here. The US "framework" is not a signed FTA, so it does not add to the nine. And these agreements are not negotiated through the WTO; they are bilateral or pluri-lateral treaties that sit alongside India's multilateral WTO commitments.

For UPSC: India's FTA tally in 2025-26 = nine agreements across 38 countries. Remember the two booby-traps โ€” the India-EFTA TEPA (EFTA = Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, Switzerland; not the EU) entered into force on 1 October 2025, and the separate India-EU FTA dates to 27 January 2026. The United States has only an interim framework (7 February 2026), not a concluded FTA.

Why it matters

For an economy that long approached trade liberalisation warily, nine agreements in five years signals a deliberate strategy: lock in preferential market access for India's labour-intensive exports โ€” textiles, gems and jewellery, leather, pharmaceuticals, engineering goods โ€” into high-value markets like the UK, the EU and the EFTA bloc, while shielding the politically sensitive farm and dairy economy. The deals also serve a geo-strategic purpose. With the China-anchored RCEP declined, this network lets India deepen economic ties with Western and Gulf partners and diversify supply chains away from a single dominant source. The EFTA TEPA's USD 100 billion investment commitment, and the services and mobility chapters in the UK and EU talks, point to the second-generation goal: not just selling more goods, but attracting investment and winning professional-mobility access for Indian workers abroad. The repeated stress on protecting dairy, agriculture and small domestic industry reflects the domestic political constraint that shaped every one of these negotiations and that explains why the US framework remains short of a full agreement.

A useful comparison is with the agreement India did not join. RCEP would have bound India into a single tariff-cutting bloc with China, the ten ASEAN states, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand; New Delhi withdrew in 2019 over an unfavourable trade balance with China and inadequate safeguards for farmers and small manufacturers. The 2025-26 network is the strategic answer to that decision โ€” instead of one large multilateral pact dominated by a rival economy, India built a chain of bilateral deals it could shape one partner at a time, each with sensitive sectors carved out. That same logic explains why an FTA with the United States, India's largest single export market, has produced only a framework so far: the hardest bargaining is precisely over the dairy and agricultural access that India has consistently refused to open.

For Mains

Anchor
A question on India's recent trade diplomacy or its FTA strategy can be answered directly around this nine-agreement network โ€” its chronology, its design logic (ring-fencing sensitive sectors), and the RCEP-to-bilateral pivot it represents.
Substantiation
Supplies hard data: nine FTAs / 38 countries; EFTA TEPA in force 1 October 2025 with a USD 100 billion / 15-year investment pledge; UK CETA signed July 2025; India-EU FTA 27 January 2026.
Exemplification
A concrete example of India calibrating openness with protectionism โ€” opening markets for labour-intensive exports while explicitly shielding dairy, agriculture and farmers.
Problematisation
The review's own emphasis on "protected" sensitive sectors hints at the unresolved tension โ€” deeper market access (especially with the US and EU on dairy and agriculture) collides with farmer livelihoods and domestic-industry interests.
Way-forward
Points toward converting interim/early-harvest arrangements (Australia ECTA, the US framework) into comprehensive agreements, and operationalising investment and mobility commitments rather than leaving them on paper.
Position
India's stated stance: expand preferential access aggressively, but never at the cost of dairy, agriculture, farmers and small domestic industry.
Deploys into: India's bilateral and regional economic groupings (GS2.18); industrial/trade-liberalisation policy and effects of globalisation on the farm sector (GS3.8); and India's external-sector diversification strategy.
Ministry of Commerce & Industry ยท 2026-03-06 ยท PRID 2236134 ยท PIB source โ†—

Related: India-Canada agri-trade engagement (same day) ยท International Relations ยท This week's cards